![]()
FROM THE FORTHCOMING BOOK
"Are YOU Hyper-Sensitive to Electricity ? "
(PROVISIONAL TITLE)
Copyright conditions apply © 2001 Betty Venables. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, including photocopying and recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the author. |
Foreword
Mankind and all living creatures, for their very survival, are dependant on the naturally occurring electric and magnetic forces of Nature. Deprived of these elements, life on earth could not be sustained, a fact which has been scientifically determined.
For our industries, homes, street lighting and entertainment pursuits, we are dependant upon and consume, enormous amounts of artificially generated electricity, providing a way of life that few would care to relinquish. Indeed, society as we know it would not survive without this source of energy.
Wherever electrical energy is found, there will be zones of electric and magnetic field radiation (EMF or EMR). Many millions of dollars have been spent on scientific investigation over the years, in the attempt to determine whether EMR is actually hazardous to human health. Research and debate continue to this day.
STATIC ELECTRICITY
Naturally occurring static electricity, is caused by the friction of air molecules in the upper atmosphere which manifest as lightning. Static electricity can also be artificially generated by air-circulating fans, used in some electrical appliances and by the friction of synthetic fabrics in clothing, footwear and furnishings. Electro static discharge, (ESD) of accumulated static electricity on the body surface, from any source, may produce a 'zap' or 'mini-shock', as the transfer of accumulated charges take place. This can occur as a hand touches the car door on alighting, another object, or even another person. While believed to be relatively harmless, accumulated electrostatic charges are known to cause minor to extreme irritability, clumsiness and fatigue in some people. This may lead to inconsistent behaviour, reduced work performance or render the person accident prone. Susceptible people do not tolerate well, low-humidity weather conditions, when electrostat
ic charges are prolific. A moist atmosphere keeps ESD at a comfortable level and there are anti static products available to assist in controlling build-up.
ELECTRICAL CONDUCTION
The electricity we use in modern society is artificially generated at power stations. Leaving the station at high voltages, it is then progressively 'stepped down' by means of transformers to voltages we can use in the home and workplace. Cables conduct electricity, either overhead or underground, to the walls, ceilings and floors of our factories, offices and homes, to operate the machinery, lights and appliances within. A cable conducting electricity becomes 'live' if the insulating cover of the cable is ruptured, the bare wire then becomes dangerous to touch as it will conduct electricity - by physical touch - into our body tissues. Depending on the voltage, this will produce effects ranging from a 'startle' response to burn, shock or electrocution.
ELECTRICAL INDUCTION
We know that electricity, if conducted through our system via physical contact, may seriously harm us. We know far less about how electricity may affect us by induction. This action is described in the concise Oxford dictionary as "the bringing about of electric or magnetic state in a body by proximity (without contact) of an electrified or magnetized body." Electricity induced into our biological system, by close proximity, interacting with our own unique, biological electricity, has the potential to exert a subtle yet powerful influence on our behaviour, health and wellbeing.
Many people believe that although biological changes occur from EMR induction, health may not necessarily be impaired. There are published studies that appear to confirm this position. At the same time considerable scientific evidence to the contrary is mounting, slowly eliminating the uncertainty which has prevailed regarding the EMR health connection. Cancers and other diseases are now strongly linked with EMR exposure. Anecdotal evidence of EMR-affected individuals in the community also continues to increase in volume.
ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE (EMI) & COMPATIBILITY (EMC)
All electrically operated technology is surrounded by electromagnetic fields which have the potential to cause electromagnetic interference (EMI), to other electrical apparatus, resulting in system malfunction. The personal computer is particularly vulnerable to both sustaining and causing EMI. There are reports of electrically driven wheelchairs operating out of control, malfunction of hearing aids and car locking systems, remote (radio) controlled devices unexpectedly operating ; incidents all traced to EMI.
Hospitals and doctors' surgeries now ban mobile phones from the premises to protect patient and electronic drug monitoring equipment from EMI. Laptop computers and electronic games have been banned from in-flight use by some airlines to prevent interference with navigation and control systems. Less serious is the EMI most of us have experienced with poor radio and TV reception causing static and distorted screen images, audio and visible signs of electro-magnetic interference (EMI) hair dryers and food processors are known culprits, among others.
To avoid EMI, industry has devised Standards to ensure Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC), and to which all electronic and electrical design and operation must now comply. Our technology now enjoys a protection against electromagnetic interference that many humans would envy, as the following anecdotal evidence will reveal.
It has been scientifically established also, that the human biological system requires EMC with the electrical environment in order to avoid adverse biological effects, which predispose the system to malfunction, leading to a high probability of disease. That humans need, and do not have the same degree of protection from EMI caused by modern technology is of is of immense concern to a number of scientists and lay people alike.
EMR incompatibility, allowing electromagnetic interference (EMI) to the biological organism may well be the fundamental cause, or promoter, of the many human diseases now increasing in incidence. Many diseases are now associated with electromagnetic exposure, others yet to be established. The extent to which EMC may affect the biological system is indicated in a quote by Dr Cyril Smith, Ph.D., noted researcher in Electro HyperSensitivity and co-author with Simon Best of the book, Electromagnetic Man (1989)
"Electromagnetic compatibility in medicine involves ensuring that any possible reactions of electronic and electrical apparatus with people and of people with electronic and electrical apparatus, shall not give rise to any malfunction, human or technical. Particularly as this might lead to a hazardous situation through false bio-information in a diagnosis and therapy, or through electric, magnetic or radiation interactions between the patient, operator or apparatus." [From an article EMC and ELECTRICAL HYPERSENSITIVITY by Cyril Smith. Ph.D.]
ELECTRO HYPERSENSITIVITY (EHS)
There are an increasing number of people, world wide, who have experienced repeated, debilitating health episodes either during, or following EMR exposure, which inhibit normal function and activities. These range from minor muscular 'tics' to convulsions and unconsciousness or lethargy, forgetfulness, sleep disturbances and depression, to name a few. Irrational irritability and aggression are not uncommon. A number of labels have been attached to this condition. Most used is "Electrical Sensitivity" or ES which is somewhat misleading as all living systems have an inherent 'sensitivity' to naturally occurring electricity or they could not function in a living state. Electro HyperSensitivity (EHS) is thought, by some, to best describe this complex condition. While the living system either animal or human is normally 'sensitive' to the naturally occurring electricity required to sustain life, it also may responds inappropriately to artificially generated electrical stimulus causing varying degrees of stress - the latter now so prevalent in the community.
The EHS affected person, who suspects the cause of his/her condition and wishing to avoid ridicule or disbelief, usually hesitates to speak out. They often lack sufficient knowledge of the subject, nor do they have confidence, to articulate their queries. More than one telephone inquirer, seeking help, has uttered the following words, "this may seem a silly question but ..."
We quote from an Electric Utility (USA) publication of December 1992 titled Questions and Answers About Electric and Magnetic Fields. " I can perceive electric and magnetic fields, what can I do? Where is it coming from? Are there other people like me ? My doctor can't help. Where can I get information ? Can you do something ... make it stop? "
Immense relief is often expressed when an inquirer discovers they are not alone with this problem, that their reactions to EMR are valid, and "no, they are not crazy". Many people have expressed the fear that they may go crazy if relief for their particular set of symptoms could not be found.
Published here are a sample number of reports from people who are in no doubt that their health has been severely compromised by involuntary EMR exposure. They have become Electro HyperSensitive (EHS), the term given to a state of health, where their system overreacts to external EMR in their home and external environs, causing physical and neurological symptoms or is found to exacerbate other conditions.
These people, once fully functioning, productive members of society, now find they are unable to sustain normal employment or social activities. Their personal relationships also suffer. Some are now semi-invalids and if living in rented accommodation, find it almost impossible to find an electrically comfortable place in which to live. When upon inquiry and investigation, they become certain of the cause of their condition, they find the landlord does not want to make expensive electrical installation changes. The landlord also, does not wish to know he/she could possibly be legally liable for ignoring a heath risk to the tenants.
MEDICAL TREATMENT
Many EHS patients are treated symptomatically for health complaints, medical investigation having failed to reveal the cause. EHS is not recognised as a medical entity. As the patient unfolds an often bewildering array of symptoms, it is not uncommon for the consulting physician to conclude that these symptoms are psychosomatic in origin. Frequently, psychiatric treatment is recommended. In a reported number of cases the patient suffering the effects of EHS has been diagnosed as paranoid schizophrenic or having tendencies in that direction. Psychotropic drugs, prescribed for an incorrect diagnosis, have been known to cause further distress and health problems for the patient. EHS people often have multiple allergies: to food additives, chemicals and numerous drugs and even natural substances.
The physician could serve the patient well by directing him/her to an appropriate agency* for advice on dealing with the reduction of EMR exposure. Such information should also be available to the householder, architects, builders, owner-builders, pre-school managers and school principles. In fact any person with duty of care to others regardless of age.
* N.B. The proposed agency should be clearly independent of any commercial interest.
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF EMR
EMR is a biologically active agent that has demonstrable, adverse effects on the human system, which in turn has the potential to lower the health status of the individual. Depression and sleep abnormalities are common, both conditions having real potential to cause further adverse health effects. Tests for EMR hypersensitivity are not readily available. Among the very few are studies which show that EHS condition can be determined by autonomic nervous system function and blood cell irregularities.
EHS has not been taken seriously enough to elicit scientific study, on a meaningful scale, which may lead to a treatment. The only remedy of any real benefit at present is for those seriously affected to completely avoid EMR ... were this possible. The majority of EHS sufferers struggle to cope with an electrical environment, which they can no longer tolerate.
SOURCES OF EXPOSURE
The symptoms reported by EHS people are usually found to occur during or after being in close proximity to sources of EMR. These would include power lines, either high or low voltage, electric blankets, water beds, appliances, fluorescent lights, computers, photo-copiers, mobile phones, hair dryers, and hand held electric tools. Electricity extension leads, either connected or disconnected, often located under beds, and motor vehicles, electric trains and air travel are sources of EMR.
TIME FOR ACTION
People who are aware of the EMR connection and their illness (EHS) believe that further debate is superfluous. They and other well informed people, having studied the available literature on the EMR factor with regard to human health, wish to see strategies implemented immediately, directed toward reducing EMR emissions at all levels of design and manufacture of electrical and electronic goods, and the distribution and supply of electricity.
THE TOXIC CHEMICAL CONNECTION
While there is a notable lack of understanding by the general public regarding the adverse impact on health of EMR, perhaps there is a slightly greater level of awareness of the affects of toxic chemical exposures. After all there have been warnings on labels of products containing toxic chemicals to avoid contact and inhalation, for some years now. Personal computers are a known source of many toxic chemicals that outgass from the unit.
However public awareness is almost nil regarding the extremely important fact that there exists a synergism between chemicals and electromagnetic radiation. Simultaneous exposure to both these environmental agents will allow each to potentiate the adverse effects of the other. (1) Dr Ross Adey
It has been demonstrated in scientific studies that where a known cancer promoting chemical is used and a certain frequency and dose of EMR also is applied, the resulting expected cancer cell growth rate is greater than would occur as a result of the chemical agent alone. (2) Dr G Philips
EMR exposure has also been found to significantly alter the effects of a number of prescribed drugs. (3) Dr Henry Lai Also causing allergic and hyper- sensitive responses is contact with or involuntary inhalation of volatile organic compounds, (VOCs) motor vehicle exhaust fumes, and petro-chemically based fragrances. Their interaction with EMR exposure causes enhanced adverse effects. It is frequently found that toxic chemical exposure causing multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) is involved with Electro-HyperSensitivity, this will be seen in the following case notes, where applicable, as 'MCS' under the heading: 'Health Status'
Germany is the first country to officially recognise MCS as a disease. (WHO's International Classification of Diseases 2001) As the medical profession generally does not yet recognise either EHS or MCS as medical entities, these conditions are not usually considered as possible causative agents of the patient's condition. In actual fact one or both may be involved.
Many people have found that reducing the level of chemical exposure from household and personal products, also reduces the severity and incidence of EHS and vice versa. The reduction of exposure to both agents is recommended.
WARNING ! It should never be presumed that Electro- HyperSensitivity or Chemical Sensitivity is the sole cause of any symptom. Many factors play a part in the development of human disease. Thorough medical investigation should be undertaken to establish a diagnosis. Should a diseased state be diagnosed however, reduction or elimination of the patient's stress from any source is advisable. EMR is a known biological stressor, and therefore should be seriously addressed in the patient's recovery programme. |
THE CANCER PATIENT'S WELFARE
In Australia, and elsewhere, doctors do not question cancer patients regarding their EMR environment. In Germany some doctors are known to recommend EMR assessment of the cancer patient's home and workplace. Here in Australia the best we can do is advise general practitioners, via a 2 page leaflet, that EMR is merely a distraction, when compared to the known causes of cancer.
Interestingly, some cancer patients when introduced to the EMR Factor at Cancer Support Group meetings and elsewhere, have reported that prior to developing cancer, they had experienced chronic EMR exposure for a significant duration of time, either in their workplace or home.
The exposure sites mentioned, were identical to those reported by people who have developed Electro HyperSensitivity (EHS). This, in our view, indicates the value of the EHS person's experiences, as they are revealing the zones of influence of a potential health hazard most people do not find until disease has been established, if at all.
There are inexpensive EMR detection devices available (Gauss meters and electric field detectors) that could be loaned to patients for the purpose of locating and avoiding sources of EMR. These sites should be noted and included in the patient's case notes for notification to various Cancer Councils. A central register of this nature could be valuable in determining the need for EMR avoidance at all possible levels due to appliances, household electricity wiring installation, equipment design and use, electricity transmission and distribution practices.
Already, the association of EMR with childhood and adult leukemia, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, breast, testicular, prostate and other cancers, is such that responsible management of the patient should include assessment of their EMR environment. Reliable advice on how to avoid exposure should be given.
SOME POSITIVE ACTION
In 1998, a working Group under the Research and Public Information Dissemination (RAPID ) program (USA) recommended classing EMF's (electromagnetic fields ) as a 2B possible carcinogen. In June 2001, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has publicly announced that they have classified EMFs as a possible human carcinogen. The California Dept of Health Services (CDHS) has also classified EMF. as a possible human carcinogen. The low key language expressing these conclusions is that usually employed by the scientific fraternity. This should not detract from the importance of this latest, long overdue announcement - a welcome step forward in our view.
UNDERSTANDING THE PROBLEM
In order to understand the Electro HyperSensitivity phenomenon, it has been necessary to undertake serious study of the available literature of Drs Cyril Smith, Jean Monro, Choy, William Rea, and Per-Arne Ockerman, dealing with biological effects of EMR exposure. As mentioned earlier, very little scientific study has been conducted dealing with hyper-sensitivity to electricity. The available material, together with anecdotal evidence, keen observation by the author and study of the effects of both exposure and avoidance of EMR on individuals, forms the background to this chapter.
As with all subject-matter, experience will always heighten understanding. The author's experiences with this debilitating and sometimes disabling condition has enhanced understanding of the effects on others.
Work of this nature is often conducted by interested lay people, who may lack the resources to collect, evaluate and present their work in a scientific manner, which may be preferred by those engaged professionally in the field. The manner in which the work is presented or expressed here, should not in any way detract from its value and no apology is made for any such shortcomings in terms of presentation, in the following text. The 'unscientific' expressions used to describe the unique experiences of a particular person, in many of the cases, is the language used by that person. It is not uncommon for people to find it difficult to define their EMR related experiences.
This information is disseminated publicly, prior to release of the book, "Are YOU Hyper Sensitive to Electricity ? " in order to encourage those who are similarly afflicted, to come forward and tell their story. This will assist in expanding the knowledge regarding the considerable adverse impact EMR is having on community health . The empirical data amassed from such reports should serve to influence scientists working professionally in this field, to instigate further meaningful research. We may, as a result, expect appropriately designed studies, to produce results which are bound to support those already published, which will in turn, vindicate the mounting anecdotal evidence.
The continuing accumulation of evidence, of the widespread exposure and effects of EMR, should clearly demonstrate the need for lowering the levels of EMR to the human population, whatever the cost.
References : Available on request from: B Venables, 216 President Ave, Miranda, NSW 2228, Australia
ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE OF ELECTRO-HYPERSENSITIVITY
Legend :
The Demand Switch mentioned in these cases is a specially devised switch, when installed at the electricity meter board, which effectively controls the supply of electricity to the household lighting and or power circuits. It allows electricity to flow on demand. While all lighting or power point switches are in the OFF position, the electrical current is absent in that circuit of the house wiring, a desirable state for those wishing to avoid EMR. |
CASE # 1 1989 F/50+
Health Status: Unstable Hypertension chronic pain-head pains- confusion.
Exposure: Amateur radio transmitter - MBS LVPL - Domestic. Corner block- right angle configuration of 415 volt power
lines.
This busy mother of a growing family suffered debilitating effects of exposure until the power line configuration in the street
was changed by power authorities. Headaches were significantly diminished to an occasional episode.
A DEMAND SWITCH was installed, which automatically controls the demand for electricity of the lighting circuit reducing EMR exposure dramatically. Within one week there was a significant improvement in mood and energy levels. In 10 days the depression markedly diminished and better health generally was experienced.
Note: In the event that any device such as an electric clock, smoke detector or surveillance system is hard-wired to the 8amp lighting circuit, the Demand Switch will allow current to flow and so defeat the purpose of eliminating live electric current from the circuit. |
In this case, the smoke detector system was the problem and once detected was then rewired - independently to the lighting circuit, thus allowing the Demand Switch to operate as designed. A period of two weeks saw a marked change for the better in this lady's energy levels and depression and she progressed to become once again, her cheerful self.
NOTE: Both these cases highlight the adverse effect that the electric field component of electromagnetic energy has on the exposed individual.
The observed, marked changes in health to the people mentioned in the previous two cases, and other similar cases, leaves no doubt that the electric field component of EMR exposure is involved in the debilitating health conditions reported.
It has been remarked by scientists that we really are not sure which component of EMR is more potent in producing adverse biological effects, the electric field, the magnetic field or the electrostatic field - or all three. In the experience and observation of this author all three components have subtle, yet profound effects on the health of the individual.
CASE # 7 1992 F/40+
Health Status: MCS CFS EHS WS
Exposure: RFR LVPL
This lady has severe chemical sensitivity and while using a computer, loses co-ordination and feels generally uncomfortable
then, if the activity is prolonged, she becomes unconscious. She does not sleep well if the bedlamp is left switched ON at the
power-point. If reacting to petro-chemicals, perfumes, cleaning products, cigarette smoke, car exhaust fumes at the same
time as EMR exposure, her reactions to both EMR & chemicals are exacerbated causing severe reactions. She has
sustained injury from falls caused by these effects. She has stated " I cannot wear a quartz watch. The figures on screen fade
and reappear when I remove the watch. A compass will deviate from North when I am nearby. Hand held battery operated
games of chance- if I am reacting to chemicals I score 100% accuracy. " If I am not reacting, random scores occur." She
also reacts conversely to positive and negative ions. She experiences a calmative reaction to excessive POSITIVE IONS
and agitation and aggression when NEGATIVE IONS predominate.
Note: The reaction to negative and positive ions in this case is a paradox, the reverse reaction to the majority of people. There are also reported extreme cases of EHS. Light sensitivity caused by exposure to electric light globe power, higher than 40 Watts and even sunlight cause serious distress to some people. These individuals are in the extreme minority, having progressed to this state over time. While undue alarm regarding these cases should be avoided, their plight may not be ignored. These cases need to be acknowledged as they serve as a warning of the potentially serious nature of the EHS condition. |
Note: This in fact is why the ESD protection industry was developed, to protect delicate electronic components from degradation during the assembly process, which will lead to product malfunction. In all electronic component processing plants, operators on the assembly lines may be seen wearing anti-static wrist straps. |
CASE # 14 1993 F/60+
Health Status: MCS EHS
Exposure: 132 KV HVPL across road, close to street lights.
A woman removed the fuse from 8 amp fuse of overhead lighting at the meter board . Renewed energy and improved quality
of sleep was experienced. September '95 house wiring need repair and the fuse was returned to the 8 amp lighting circuit in
the meter box, in the belief that the health problems were then resolved. The fuse was in the meter box for a period of 10
weeks during which time the lady's health deteriorated. She became more reactive to chemical exposure, experiencing
depression and loss of energy. The 8 amp fuse was removed once again. Four days later her energy had returned as well as
general health improvement. This lady now uses an anti-static mat when using her landline phone and finds less stress with
long phone conversations. Severity of MCS now diminished.
CASE # 16 1999 F/30+
Health Status; MCS EHS
Exposure: HVPL LVPL
This young woman reacted adversely to office environment , tried to work from home with mobile phone and laptop
computer. Generalised pain, tetany (shoulders and neck muscles seized up ) Naturopath diagnosed her Lymphatic system
was affected. Consulted herbalist, GP, acupuncture, nutritional support gave only minimum benefit. A copper electrode was
installed at house, to establish a good ground for the electrical system and she felt better. Isolating or avoiding areas of EMR
exposure in house proved also to be beneficial. She is obviously affected by exposure to mobile phone base station
emissions as well as 50 Hertz power line frequency. This intelligent, studious young woman has had to curtail studies and put
her career on hold due to the adverse effects EMR has on her. Not to mention the loss of a healthy social life to which all
young people are entitled.
Note: It is not uncommon to find low voltage power lines, located either overhead or underground, around the perimeter of a corner residential block or across the ceilings and then traversing vertically down the walls of units and semi-detached villas. This will form a right angle configuration within which the magnetic fields can measure 40% higher than the field measurements outside the same right angle. The occupants of any dwelling located within this right angle configuration will be exposed to significantly high levels of electromagnetic energy. High voltage power lines may also be found both overhead and underground in this same configuration creating a serious EMR exposure for the occupants of these dwellings. It is a practice that needs serious revision by power authorities, architects and master/owner builders. The document " Prudent Avoidance of Power Line Frequency Electromagnetic Fields " omitted the inclusion of this important point. This was drawn to the attention of the principal author of the Prudent Avoidance document. He stated that this point would be included in any revision of document. Meantime, the EMR SAFETY NETWORK INTERNATIONAL would like to draw public attention to this particular cabling installation issue. |
CASE # 22 2000 F /50yr
Health Status: MCS CFS EHS
Exposure: Adjacent to railway Line - Mobile phone
This lady, if using mobile phone for 2 minutes develops : burning headaches - tingling sensation through head. The phone
itself gets hot - The more frequent the use of phone the sooner the effects occur and are more intense they become The
home feels hot to touch. When this lady is reacting to chemicals, the microwave oven "automatically" switches on when she
enters the kitchen and EMR reaction generally becomes more severe.
CASE # 30 1999 F/70+
Health Status: MCS CFS EHS
Exposure: Mobile Base Station on roof of units' meterbox at head height in hallway leading to bedroom and bathroom.
After this lady moved to this high rise unit block , numerous ailments have developed , pains at top of head, depression,
generalised pain. Gastric complaints. Conventional medical treatment has been ineffective. She has not been able to sleep
comfortably in her (innerspring mattress) bed for some time. She now sleeps in the lounge room where lounge is located in
centre of room away from walls where cables are located.
CASE # 33 1996 M/50+
Health Status: EHS
Exposure: computer - domestic
This man's wife observed that he appeared to have a change of personality when he began using a computer, he also became
hyperactive.
CASE # 38 1994 F/50+
Health Status: Insomnia + EHS
Exposure : domestic EMR
A woman experienced sleep disturbance in bed located against wall of unit where electricity cables also were located. The
bed was put on castors and moved 18 inches from the wall at night. This resulted in better quality sleep and improved
wellbeing, for both husband and wife, though the husband had not previously been aware that he was adversely affected .
Cases #44, #45 and #46 are from the same home.
CASE # 54 2000 F/40+
Health Status: MCS CFS EHS
Food & chemical allergies, hypersensitive to EMR and vibration, trembling after exposure causes extreme stress for this
young woman. She finds that spraying her body with water helps. (This may reduce electrostatic charge build-up. )
Soon after, she observed, not previously evident, the reactions of a young man who was then standing in the same location - he displayed a repeated, pronounced, involuntary twitch of his right shoulder The wall was later checked with a Gaussmeter where a magnetic field of 20 milliGauss was registered on the area of the wall in question
N.B. In this as in many cases it is not known for certain, whether the affected individual is reacting to the electric or the magnetic field, or both.
If having been exposed to EMR prior to sleep, during the first half hour of sleep she feels electrical disturbances in the brain. Also experiences are a mild inward air suction through the ears, as well as a metallic/ electronic clicking in the ear - the head feels as though it is lifted up - with a numb feeling right at the crown and back of head
Often EMR exposure induces a drowsiness and when sleep follows it is abruptly interrupted by the brain "short circuits" as she describes them. She also experiences sharp jabbing pains which can occur in any area of her body including the eyeballs, when in a bus where mobile phones are transmitting. The effects are similar in nature to those induced by the computer.
N.B. The misdiagnosis of schizophrenia in the foregoing case, as in other cases on record, will no doubt be repeated until the EHS condition is officially recognised by the medical profession and treated accordingly. Little information regarding this condition, is available to the medical profession at the present time. Few doctors have the time to pursue the topic, if they were so inclined.
In 1995 it was stated by one health writer that while general practitioners knew little about EHS at that time, they would need to study the subject, as by the year 2000 the majority of their patients would be presenting with EMR related conditions. To date, little progress has been made in this regard.
![]()
The EMR SAFETY NETWORK-INTERNATIONAL, Phone 02 9540 3936